| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dave Stark
2842
   |
Posted - 2013.04.25 19:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
silens vesica wrote:Nex apparatu5 wrote:http://i.imgur.com/WzXjyuN.jpg
Whoops, there goes that theory. Turns out if you remove losses to rats, hisec comes in third. That's value, not numbers of hulls. But it's still probably a correct call.
considering it's in terms of isk, wormholes being so low is reasonably surprising since they tend to fly around in reasonably blingy ships in comparison to other areas of the game.
although number of hulls would be interesting. |
Dave Stark
2843
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 19:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Dave Stark wrote:considering it's in terms of isk, wormholes being so low is reasonably surprising since they tend to fly around in reasonably blingy ships in comparison to other areas of the game. Hull cost only, the graph doesn't incorporate mods. If it did then yes, wh space would be higher.
if it's just hull cost then this graph is almost totally meaningless.
no **** null is at the top since they have capitals etc where as high sec hull costs seldom exceed what, 200m? with the exception of orcas/freighters. |
Dave Stark
2843
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 19:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:In addition, what makes you think there are more ships lost to pvp in highsec than in null?
at a guess i'm going to say things like RvB systematically throwing away multitudes of cheap disposable ships, where as null leans towards t2 ships, capital ships, and such like.
*shrug* i can see where he's coming from but there isn't exactly any evidence to support it. |
Dave Stark
2844
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 19:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Tis only ship value in ISK shown on that graph.
Just means that most highseccers run around and pew in the Eve equivalent of Yugos while the nullsec crowd goes and pews with their Lamborghinis and Bugattis.
Also, that graph would look different if lets say...capitals were allowed in highsec. 1 titan kill is the equivalent of how many millions of rifter kills?
Actual hulls destroyed in numbers vs ISK would have been the goto graph.
that wouldn't be a graph, it'd be a scatter plot. it would just be 4 dots. it'd only tell you who flies more expensive ships. which we all know is wormhole players, really. |
Dave Stark
2852
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 07:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:CCP cant offer even more isk for 0.0 pve activities so that leaves nerfing high as the only viable option. Unlike many highsecers, we are willing to see past our own greed to see through balance needs.
not to mention, the last thing eve needs are more/bigger isk faucets. |
Dave Stark
2904
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 19:52:00 -
[6] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:Andski wrote:Nullsec players have alts in hisec, hope this helps. So I suppose that just means that Null sec players are technically High sec players too. Ergo, most Null sec players are dirty High sec carebears on their alts? yes, all the hate you see is simply a manifestation of self-loathing. they need to come to terms with their inner bear and let go of this 'game imbalance' delusion.
or the fact that they're frustrated that they feel the game forces them to have high sec alts to do what they should be doing in null sec, but don't do in null sec because it's done better/easier in high sec? |
| |
|